Hazel Barnes’s “Self-Encounter: A Study in Existentialism,” Episode 3: To Leap Or Not To Leap.

By Z

***

I. Introduction by Z

In The Literature of Possibility, she says that

[f]or almost a century now, prevailing psychologies and the literature written under their influence have agreed that men cherish the illusion of freedom, while being in fact determined by heredity, by environment, and by early childhood experiences. Humanistic existentialism challenges this doctrine and claims that the reverse is true: every man is free, but most men, fearing the consequences and the responsibilities of freedom, refuse to acknowledge its presence in themselves and would deny it to others.[i]

And she was right–especially about people’s refusal to acknowledge their metaphysically, morally, and politically real free agency, and their insistence on denying it to others.

Barnes’s work is almost entirely ignored by contemporary professional academic philosophers.

But this is merely professionally-induced amnesia, presentist prejudice, and ideological rigor mortis.

In fact, her work is philosophically important for many reasons, not the least of which are its fusion of core Existentialist ideas with a broadly Kantian, dignitarian ethics, and its elective affinity with social anarchism.

In her fascinating autobiography, The Story I Tell Myself, she writes about her brief career as a public philosopher and TV personality:

One of the most interesting by-products of my philosophical commitment [to Existentialism] was a proposal from people at KRMA, the Denver affiliate of National Public Television, that I work with them on a series of ten half-hour shows for the national network. These would be concerned with Existentialism. I would be host and discussant and would select illustrative material for filming. After viewing our pilot tape, the national office approved and granted us funding. I called the series “Self-Encounter.” For each program I chose a basic theme, for which I developed [a]n informal lecture with accompanying visual presentations. Sometimes the visual material served as background to add emotional connotations to an idea, or to enhance a mood. More often we interpolated dramatic scenes taken from plays and from dialogues in novels…. “Self-Encounter” was telecast on the national network in 1962.[ii]

When she wrote this, in 1997, Barnes thought that the tapes for her 1962 PBS series, Self-Encounter: A Study in Existentialism had all been destroyed.[iii]

But actually, they hadn’t: one set had been preserved by the Library of Congress.

Below is the third episode, “To Leap Or Not To Leap.”

Many thanks to Jeffrey Ward Larsen, Andrew D. Chapman, and Addison Ellis for their material, technological, and philosophical assistance with this project.

NOTES

[ii] H. Barnes, The Story I Tell Myself (Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1997), pp. 166–167.

[iii] Ibid, p. 168

***

II. Hazel Barnes’s “Self-Encounter: A Study in Existentialism,” Episode 3: To Leap Or Not To Leap

***

III. Previous Episodes

Episode 2: “The Far Side of Despair”

***

AGAINST PROFESSIONAL PHILOSOPHY REDUX 240

Mr Nemo, W, X, Y, & Z, Thursday 14 February 2019

Against Professional Philosophy is a sub-project of the online mega-project Philosophy Without Borders, which is home-based on Patreon here.

Please consider becoming a patron!

Formerly Captain Nemo. A not-so-very-angry, but still unemployed, full-time philosopher-nobody.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store