AGAINST PROFESSIONAL PHILOSOPHY RETROSPECTIVE 1.

On Tuesday 4 April 2017, the radical, renegade philosophy blog, Against Professional Philosophy, aka APP, publishing online since 2013, was hacked and destroyed.

So much for freedom of speech in contemporary philosophy!

Nevertheless, by dint of round-the-clock work, we were able to re-create the original Against Professional Philosophy site, and roll it out again on 11 April 2017.

And it was a sobering experience.

Therefore, we’ve resolved that we won’t let ourselves be shut down again, even for a week.

We’ve decided to CONTINUE publishing here on Medium, hosted by Mr Nemo, IN PARALLEL WITH the re-created APP site.

That is, we’ll continue to publish our new posts on Medium, under the rubric AGAINST PROFESSIONAL PHILOSOPHY REDUX, on Mondays, and also to re-publish our archival material from 2013 forward, under the rubric, AGAINST PROFESSIONAL PHILOSOPHY RETROSPECTIVE, on Wednesdays and Fridays.

Real philosophy can’t be silenced.

Mr Nemo, W, X, Y, and Z, Wednesday 12 April 2017.

Against Professional Philosophy is a sub-project of the online mega-project Philosophy Without Borders, which is home-based on Patreon here.

***

The Home Page.

By W, X, Y, and Z

Originally published 20 July 2013.

W, X, Y, and Z all share a deep love of real philosophy. By real philosophy, we mean synoptic, systematic, rational reflection on the individual and collective human condition, and on the natural world in which human and other conscious animals live, move, and have their being. Real philosophy fully includes the knowledge yielded by the natural and formal sciences; but, as we see it, real philosophy also goes significantly beneath and beyond the exact sciences, and non-reductively incorporates aesthetic, artistic, affective/emotional, ethical/moral, and, more generally, personal and practical insights that cannot be adequately captured or explained by the sciences. In a word, real philosophy is all about the nature, meaning, and value of individual and collective human existence in the natural cosmos, and how it is possible to know the philosophical limits of science, without also being anti-science. Finally, real philosophy is pursued by people working on individual or collective writing projects, or teaching projects, in the context of small, friendly circles of like-minded philosophers. Like-minded but not uncritical! Real philosophers read both intensively and also widely inside philosophy, and also widely outside of philosophy, critically discuss what they’ve read, write, mutually present and talk about their work, re-read, re-discuss, and then re-write, with the primary aim of producing work of originality and of the highest possible quality, given their own individual and collective abilities. They also seek to disseminate their work, through publication, teaching, or public conversation.

In view of this conception of real philosophy, we also share some serious worries about contemporary professional philosophy. More bluntly put, we think that contemporary professional philosophy is seriously fucked up in various ways that, ironically and even tragically, oppose and undermine the ongoing project of real philosophy.

The threefold purpose of this co-authored philosophical diary, then, is, first, to tell about our own inner and outer lives as professional philosophers from our four very different points of view; second, to develop the art of resisting and subverting contemporary professional philosophy from the inside, for the sake of real philosophy, i.e., anarcho-philosophy; and third, to prepare the way for the real philosophy of the future by featuring past or present philosophical work that is aggressively cosmopolitan and non-chauvinist, critically challenging and edgy, daringly generalist and original, fully humanly meaningful, slightly weird, and deemed “unpublishable” in mainstream venues.

Our immediate goal at APP is the same as Immanuel Kant’s, in the justly famous opening sentences of “What is Enlightenment?”

“Enlightenment is the human being’s emergence from his own self-incurred immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to make use of one’s own understanding without direction from another. This immaturity is self-incurred when its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in lack of resolution and courage to use it without direction from another. Sapere aude! Have the courage to use your own understanding! is thus the motto of Enlightenment.”

In other words, we think that it’s up to all of us, as lovers of real philosophy, to dare to think for ourselves against the conventional wisdom of contemporary professional philosophy. But that’s only the beginning. We hope to help contemporary philosophers (re)discover their true vocation as rational rebels for humanity–

“When nature has unwrapped, from under this hard shell, the seed for which she cares most tenderly, namely the propensity and calling to think freely, the latter gradually works back upon the mentality of the people (which thereby gradually becomes capable of freedom in acting) and eventually even upon the principles of government, which finds it profitable to itself to treat the human being, who is now more than a machine, in keeping with [her] dignity.”

Sincerely,
W, X, Y, and Z

***

Mr Nemo, W, X, Y, and Z, Wednesday 12 April 2017.

Against Professional Philosophy, aka APP, is a sub-project of the online mega-project Philosophy Without Borders, aka PWB, which is home-based on Patreon here. APP and the other sub-projects of PWB are supported entirely by the generosity of patrons who highly value real philosophy, whether it exists inside or outside professional academic philosophy.

Formerly Captain Nemo. A not-so-very-angry, but still unemployed, full-time philosopher-nobody.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store